THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PER LANGE, KJELL ISAKSSON,
HAKAN FRANSSON, SIGVARD ORRE and RUNE WIDLUND
____________
Appeal No. 97-0963
Application No. 08/439,5151
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 6 through 11. Claim 12 has been allowed and2
claims 1 through 5 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed May 11, 1995.
2Claims 6 and 7 have been amended subsequent to the final
rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007