Appeal No. 97-0963 Page 6 Application No. 08/439,515 14, and a valve 16 for directing exhaust gases from the supercharger turbine 6 to the exhaust passage 12 either through the power turbine 8 or through the bypass passage 14. As shown in Figure 2B, the valve 16 can be a flapper valve arranged downstream of the outlet of the power turbine. The examiner concluded (final rejection, p. 2) that Woon structurally anticipated the appealed claims. Specifically, the examiner determined that the engine braking set forth in the claims is a functional and not a structural differentiation because the claims do not preclude a power turbine bypass. Thus, the examiner found that the braking recitations in the claims are merely recitations of a desired result which are not patentably limiting. We do not agree for the reasons set forth infra. We agree with the appellants argument (brief, pp. 3-5) that Woon does not disclose the claimed exhaust gas brake throttle. The claims on appeal recite an engine having an exhaust gas brake throttle. An exhaust gas brake throttle is structure that an engine possesses that permits exhaust braking of the engine. The arrangement of Woon's bypass valve 16 shown in Figure 2B is not an exhaust gas brake throttle since that structure does notPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007