Appeal No. 97-0972 Application 08/399,571 weight and may not be disregarded in evaluating the patentability of the claims (see, e.g., Ex parte Bylund, 217 USPQ 492, 498 (Bd. App. 1981)). As to the examiner’s contention that the device of Devney could be used to extend between an armrest assembly and a seat member, Devney’s invention is stated to relate to advertising sign hangers, and has for its principal object to provide simple means for the quick attachment of advertising signs to door-knobs and the like, which means will prevent the easy detachment of the sign by a breeze and consequent loss of the same, but will allow ready removal by a person. [Lines 9-16; emphasis ours.] Devney’s advertising sign is thereafter described as being constructed of “resilient material, such as celluloid, card board, or paper” (lines 55 and 56). It is readily apparent from the above description that the sign hanger of Devney is made of a resilient material which is light-weight enough to be blown away by a breeze. This sign hanger is also depicted in the various cross-sectional views of Devney as being very thin in thickness. Considering Devney’s disclosure as a whole, we do not believe that there is a reasonable basis to include that the sign hanger disclosed therein has sufficient strength and rigidity so 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007