THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARD E. DEAL JR.
________________
Appeal No. 97-1088
Application 08/518,9571
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4,
6, 10 through 13 and 19 through 25, all of the claims pending in
the application.
1Application for patent filed August 24, 1995. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
08/269,915, filed June 30, 1994, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007