Appeal No. 97-1144
Application 08/326,608
to receive and retain thereon or therein the stator of a motor.
Accordingly, even if the Prodi and Nel references are combined
as proposed in the rejection, the claimed invention would not
result. As a final note, we point out that a review of the
O’Brien patent reveals to us that this reference does not
overcome the deficiency of the Prodi and Nel documents.
In summary, this panel of the board has reversed the
respective rejections of appellants’ claims 7 through 13 and
claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007