THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ANDREAS WACHTLER, REINHARD HITTICH, EIKE POETSCH,
HERBERT PLACH, DAVID COATES, BERNHARD RIEGER
and JOACHIM KRAUSE
________________
Appeal No. 97-1278
Application No. 08/046,2861
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10
and 11. Claim 9, the other claim remaining in the present
1Application for patent filed April 15, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a division of Application
No. 07/585,165, filed October 16, 1990, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007