Appeal No. 97-1278 Application No. 08/046,286 and the presently appealed claims could have been properly filed in one application with, of course, the properly named inventors. We note that the Rieger patent and the present application have four common inventors. In addition, by filing a divisional application and not electing and prosecuting the appealed claims in the parent application, appellants have established that they, and not the PTO, controlled the rate of progress of the present application. In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 1053, 29 USPQ2d 2010, 2016 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) liquid-crystalline media containing at least one compound of the formula I. -6-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007