THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte SHADI L. MALHOTRA
________________
Appeal No. 97-1453
Application No. 08/196,6721
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, ELLIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-11
and 36. Claim 12 has been allowed by the examiner. Claims
13-30, the other claims remaining in the present application,
1Application for patent filed February 15, 1994.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-
part of Application No. 08/034,943, filed March 19, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007