Appeal No. 97-1475 Application 08/069,544 arrangement wherein the lock which secures such a cover in position "must be removed to gain access to said ignition lock tumbler," as set forth in appellant's method claim 27 on appeal. In addition, our comments supra with regard to Dalby are again pertinent here. For these reasons, we will not sustain the examiner's rejections of claims 25 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As is apparent from the foregoing, the examiner's rejection of claims 11 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph has been reversed, as has each of the examiner's rejections of claims 11 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. REVERSED JAMES M. MEISTER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 14Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007