Appeal No. 97-1476 Page 4
Application No. 08/458,689
particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter
which the appellant regards as the invention.
Claims 1 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Hawkins in view of Maasbach.
Claims 2 through 6, 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hawkins in view of
Maasbach and Takahisa.
Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Hawkins in view of Maasbach and O'Sullivan.
Claims 11 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Hawkins in view of Maasbach,
Takahisa and Lyon.
Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Hawkins in view of Maasbach and Green.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007