Appeal No. 97-1595 Application No. 08/209,786 We therefore will not sustain the rejection of independent claims 1 and 8 or, it follows, of dependent claims 2-7, 9 and 10. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge) ) ) ) WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge) 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007