Appeal No. 97-1810 Page 16 Application No. 08/321,262 We have reviewed the applied prior art but find nothing therein which would have suggested the subject matter of claim 27 for the same reasons as pointed out above with respect to claim 24. Since all the limitations of claim 27 are not suggested or taught by the applied prior art, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 21 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed with respect to claims 21 through 23, 25, 26 and 28 through 30 but is reversed with respect to claims 24 and 27.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007