Ex parte SKOLNICK et al. - Page 18




          Appeal No. 97-1999                                                          
          Application 07/390,745                                                      
          subject matter bear a reasonable correlation to the scope of                
          enablement provided by the specification.  See generally Amgen              
          Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., 927 F.2d 1200, 1212-1214,                
          18 USPQ2d 1016, 1026-1028 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S.               
          856 (1991), and In re Fisher, 427 F.2d 833, 836, 839, 166 USPQ              
          18, 21-22, 24 (CCPA 1970).  It appears from the evidence in                 
          this record that the limited teachings in the specification                 
          with only one example of an effective partial agonist, would                
          not have enabled persons skilled in an art, which was                       
          unpredictable at the time of this invention, to determine                   
          which compounds are partial agonists for the strychnine                     
          insensitive glycine modulatory site of the N-methyl-D-                      
          aspartate receptor complex and predict which of those would                 
          effectively alleviate the symptoms of any                                   
          neuropsychopharmacological disorder, without undue                          
          experimentation.                                                            
               However, in that the examiner, based on much the same                  
          evidence, declined to raise the issue of compliance with the                
          first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 either in favor of the                   
          rejection under section 103 or for reasons otherwise unclear                
          to this panel, we leave the matter of compliance with the                   
          first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 based on all the evidence                
                                       - 18 -                                         





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007