Appeal No. 97-1999 Application 07/390,745 subject matter bear a reasonable correlation to the scope of enablement provided by the specification. See generally Amgen Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., 927 F.2d 1200, 1212-1214, 18 USPQ2d 1016, 1026-1028 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 856 (1991), and In re Fisher, 427 F.2d 833, 836, 839, 166 USPQ 18, 21-22, 24 (CCPA 1970). It appears from the evidence in this record that the limited teachings in the specification with only one example of an effective partial agonist, would not have enabled persons skilled in an art, which was unpredictable at the time of this invention, to determine which compounds are partial agonists for the strychnine insensitive glycine modulatory site of the N-methyl-D- aspartate receptor complex and predict which of those would effectively alleviate the symptoms of any neuropsychopharmacological disorder, without undue experimentation. However, in that the examiner, based on much the same evidence, declined to raise the issue of compliance with the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 either in favor of the rejection under section 103 or for reasons otherwise unclear to this panel, we leave the matter of compliance with the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 based on all the evidence - 18 -Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007