Appeal No. 97-2147 Page 5
Application No. 08/512,477
Claims 7 through 9 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Sandall in view of Helver,
Salzmann and Gramling.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Sandall in view of Helver, Salzmann,
Gramling and Marocco.
Claims 1 through 3 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Helver.
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Helver in view of Marocco.
Claims 7 through 9 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Helver in view of Gramling.
Claim 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Helver in view of Gramling and Marocco.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007