THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MARK S. CHAGNON, JOHN R. FERRIS,
MICHELLE J. CARTER, TRACY J. HAMILTON and MARIA A. GRAY
________________
Appeal No. 97-2359
Application 07/894,2601
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH, OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed June 8, 1992. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/566,169, filed August 10, 1990, now abandoned,
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/455,071,
filed December 22, 1989, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007