THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DIRK NEMEGEER and YVES VANCRAEYNEST ____________ Appeal No. 97-2557 Application No. 08/453,8291 ____________ HEARD: June 10, 1998 ____________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, PATE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 25, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1Application for patent filed May 30, 1995. According to the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/058,302, filed May 10, 1993, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007