Ex parte WHICKER, JR. - Page 2




          Appeal No.97-2716                                                           
          Application 08/261,772                                                      


               WE REVERSE.                                                            


               The appellant’s invention pertains to a ground position                
          indicator and signaling device.  Independent claim 1 is further             
          illustrative of the appealed subject matter and reads as follows:           
               1.  A ground position indicator and signaling device                   
               for signaling airborne personnel comprising a                          
               substantially pliable heavy, open weave web having a                   
               triangular shape with a length ratio of sides to base                  
               of at least about 1.5:1 for deployment upon ground                     
               including a contrasting arrow on the web and means for                 
               contrast between the web and the ground, which contrast                
               means provides a high degree of visibility to the                      
               airborne personnel who are in an overhead position                     
               adjacent to the ground upon which the web is deployed.                 
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Wolff                    1,937,374      Nov. 28, 1933                       
          Adams                    3,334,554      Aug. 08, 1967                       
          Latimer                  4,019,271      Apr. 26, 1977                       
          Goff                     4,792,258      Dec. 20, 1988                       
          Hadzicki                 4,892,272      Jan. 09, 1990                       
          Hull et al.  (Hull)      5,245,943      Sep. 21, 1993                       
          Nowell et al.  (Nowell) 5,325,798       Jul. 05, 1994                       
          (Filed Dec. 22, 1992)                                                       
               The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in           
          the following manner:                                                       
               (1) claims 1, 4, 7 and 9 as being unpatentable over Adams in           
          view of Latimer and Wolff;                                                  
               (2) claim 20 as being unpatentable over Adams in view of               
          Latimer, Hull and Hadzicki;                                                 

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007