Ex parte ARBUCKLE - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 97-2780                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/456,109                                                                                                                 


                          Appellant’s claimed invention relates to a novelty                                                                            
                 display device or novelty display item, as it is called in the                                                                         
                 appealed claims. According to claim 1, the only independent                                                                            
                 claim on appeal, the novelty display item comprises a                                                                                  
                 plurality of lightweight objects (4-6) each formed of a soft                                                                           
                 foam resilient material, a rigid base (7) having an array of                                                                           
                 holders for holding the lightweight objects, and a label (8-                                                                           
                 10) with a different lettered message attached to the base                                                                             
                 under each object.  As disclosed in appellant’s specification,2                                                                                                     
                 the novelty display item may be used in a meeting in which                                                                             
                 participants are free to select one of the lightweight                                                                                 
                 objects, depending upon the message on the associated label,                                                                           
                 and to toss the selected object at the speaker.                                                                                        


                               A copy of the appealed claims is appended to                                                                             
                 appellant’s brief.                                                                                                                     




                          2      The recitation of “a respective cavity” in line 7 of claim 1 lacks                                                     
                 antecedent basis. However, when read in context with the remainder of the claim, it is                                                 
                 apparent that the cavity is intended to refer to the specific form of the holder for                                                   
                 each lightweight object. Although this informality does not obscure the metes and bounds                                               
                 of the claimed invention, it nonetheless is deserving of correction in the event of                                                    
                 further prosecution before the examiner.                                                                                               
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007