THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ROBERT L. SUTHERLAND _____________ Appeal No. 97-2807 Application 08/233,2161 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 26 through 29 and 32 through 35, all of the claims remaining in the application. Claim 1 through 25, 30 and 31 have been canceled. Application for patent filed April 26, 1994. According to appellant,1 this application is a continuation of application 07/844,588, filed March 27, 1992. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007