Appeal No. 97-2807
Application 08/233,216
We have also reviewed the patents to Guild and Bortoli
applied by the examiner in the § 103 rejections of claims 27
through 29 and 32 through 35. However, we find nothing in either
of these references which would supply that which we have noted
above to be lacking in the patents to Johnston and Sarver.
Accordingly, the examiner's rejections of dependent claims 27
through 29 and 32 through 35 on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will
likewise not be sustained.
As should be apparent from the foregoing, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 26 through 29 and 32 through 35 of
the present application is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007