THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAN E. MOLTER
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2822
Application 08/455,9001
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed May 31, 1995. According to
appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
08/333,598, filed November 2, 1994, abandoned; which is a con-
tinuation of Application 08/106,238, filed August 13, 1993,
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007