THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOANNE M. LANTZ, DAVID L. ZENKER, THOMAS H. ROESSLER,
ROB D. EVERETT, LYNN C. BRUD, BARBARA A. GOSSEN, ERIC M. JOHNS
and CYNTHIA H. NORDNESS
____________
Appeal No. 97-2963
Application No. 08/284,7281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 13, 15 to 19 and 21 to 27, which are all
of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed August 2, 1994. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 08/053,531, filed May 3, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007