Ex parte KRAMER - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2966                                                          
          Application 08/393,858                                                      


               d) axially foreshortening said forming member and said                 
          radially expanded end length of said sleeve, concertina                     
          fashion to cause circumferential portions of said sleeve to be              
          pressed between convolutions of said forming member, to form                
          at least rudimentary corrugations in said end length;                       

               e) axially extending said forming member and said end                  
          length of said sleeve while radially collapsing said end                    
          length;                                                                     
               f) moving said sleeve axially along said mandrel to a new              
          axial location;                                                             
               g) moving said forming member axially relative to said                 
          sleeve to a new length portion of said sleeve axially spaced                
          from said end length;                                                       
               h) repeating steps c through g until a desired number of               
          length portions with rudimentary corrugations are formed;                   
               i) removing said forming member from said sleeve; and                  
               j) curing said sleeve to provide a length of tubing with               
          a plurality of axially spaced corrugated segments and with a                
          uniform wall thickness.                                                     
               No prior art has been relied on by the examiner.                       
               Prior art relied on by this merits panel of the Board is:              
          Kramer et al. (Kramer)        3,304,581                Feb. 21,             
          1967                                                                        
               The prior art set forth by the appellant in lines 23-31                
          of page 2 of the specification (the admitted prior art).                    
               Claims 7-9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                
          paragraph, as being based upon an original disclosure which                 

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007