Paper No. 9
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DURWARD I. FARIES, JR.,
BRUCE R. HEYMANN and
MARK LICATA
______________
Appeal No. 97-3002
Application 08/529,4771
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, MCQUADE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
2-11, the only claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed September 18, 1995.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-
part of Application 08/399,976, filed March 7, 1995, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 08/274,869, filed July 14,
1994, now Patent No. 5,400,616, issued March 28, 1995; which is
a division of Application 08/125,279, filed September 23, 1993,
now Patent No. 5,331,820, issued July 26, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007