Ex parte FARIES, JR., et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-3002                                                          
          Application 08/529,477                                                      


               We REVERSE.                                                            
               The appellants’ invention pertains to a method and apparatus           
          for maintaining replenishable supplies of surgical sterile fluids           
          at a preselected temperature.  As set forth in the appellants’              
          ABSTRACT:                                                                   
                    Sterile surgical fluid is maintained in one or                    
               more temperature controlled basins provided at the top                 
               of a cabinet.  One or more insulated temperature                       
               controlled compartments are formed in the cabinet for                  
               storing supplemental supplies of the surgical fluid at                 
               the temperatures close to the temperatures of the                      
               basins to facilitate replenishing and/or replacing the                 
               fluid in the basins.  The storage compartments can be                  
               used for long-term temperature controlled fluid storage                
               when basin temperature is not being controlled (i.e.,                  
               between surgical procedures.                                           
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Menzel                   4,522,041           June 11, 1985                  
          Templeton                4,934,152           June 19, 1990                  
          Gordon                   5,363,746           Nov. 15, 1994                  
               Claims 2, 3, 5-9 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
          as being unpatentable over Templeton in view of Menzel.                     
               Claims 4 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
          being unpatentable over Templeton in view of Menzel and Gordon.             
               We initially note that in rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103 the examiner bears the initial burden of presenting a prima           
          facie case of obviousness.  In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1532,             
          28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007