THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LLOYD A. BABCOCK, JR.
____________
Appeal No. 97-3068
Application No. 08/389,9041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, MEISTER, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 11, 14 and 15, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed February 16, 1995.
2Claims 1, 3, 5, 11 and 15 were amended subsequent to the
final rejection. Since the examiner did not include the
rejection of claims 1 through 11, 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, in the examiner's answer, we presume
that this ground of rejection raised in the final rejection
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007