Ex parte WINNER - Page 33




          Appeal No. 97-3194                                        Page 33           
          Application No. 08/442,816                                                  


          Kenney Manufacturing Co., 864 F.2d 757, 768, 9 USPQ2d 1417,                 
          1426 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                                      


               In view of the foregoing, we are satisfied that when all               
          the evidence and arguments are considered, the evidence of                  
          nonobviousness fails to outweigh the evidence of obviousness                
          as in Richardson-Vicks Inc. v. Upjohn Co., 122 F.3d 1476, 44                
          USPQ2d 1181 (Fed. Cir. 1997) and EWP Corp. v. Reliance                      
          Universal, Inc., 755 F.2d 898, 225 USPQ 20 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                
          Accordingly, we sustain the rejections of claims 3, 4, 6, 9 to              
          20, 31 to 36 and 44 to 46 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 set forth                   
          above wherein we had determined that a prima facie case of                  
          obviousness had been established.                                           





















Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007