Appeal No. 97-3196
Application No. 08/569,275
THE REFERENCES
The references relied upon by the examiner to support the
final rejection are:
Bratzler 4,571,964 Feb. 25,
1986
Renne 5,076,077 Dec. 31,
1991
Adams, Jr. (Adams) 5,246,345 Sep. 21,
1993
THE REJECTIONS2
Claim 32 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, as being based upon a specification which fails to
provide support for the invention as now claimed.
Claims 21-32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly
point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the
appellant regards as the invention.
2A rejection on the basis of the judicially created
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting was withdrawn by
the examiner upon the filing of a terminal disclaimer.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007