Appeal No. 97-3196
Application No. 08/569,275
facie case of obviousness with regard to the subject matter of
independent claim 21. This being the case, we will not
sustain the rejection of claim 21 or of claims 22-24 and 26,
which depend therefrom.
Adding Adams to the other two references in the rejection
of claim 25 fails to cure the problems present in the basic
rejection. The rejection of claim 25 also is not sustained.
SUMMARY
The rejection of claim 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, is sustained.
The rejection of claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, is sustained.
None of the other rejections are sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007