Appeal No. 97-3210
Application No. 08/386,388
The appellant's invention is directed to a sealing
arrangement. The subject matter before us on appeal is
illustrated by reference to claim 1, which has been reproduced
in an appendix to the Brief.
THE REFERENCES
The references relied upon by the examiner to support the
final rejection are:
Ruhe et al. (Ruhe) 3,892,416 Jul. 1,
1975
Redder et al. (Redder) 4,346,801 Aug. 31,
1982
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Redder.
Claims 1 and 2 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by Ruhe.
The rejections are explained in the Examiner's Answer.
The opposing viewpoints of the appellant are set forth in
the Brief.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007