Appeal No. 97-3294 Application 08/408,225 expressly set forth in claim 1. More specifically, we understand the noted diamond shaped esophageal end of the implant of Blom as a deformed coil that simply follows uniform coils of the main implant body. Accordingly, it is the viewpoint of this panel of the board that this deformed coil (flange-like structure) at the end of a coil spring cannot be said to be “provided on an outside surface” (underlining added for emphasis) of a device body, as now claimed. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1 through 5 is reversed. Claims 14 and 15 Claim 14 requires, inter alia, a device including a resiliently deflectable device body having an insertion cross section transverse to its longitudinal extent which is insufficient to fill an opening in a human body and a larger use cross section transverse to its longitudinal extent, and a retainer removable to permit deployment of the device body to its use cross section. Claim 15 specifies the retainer as being soluble in a fluid. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007