THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DONALD SPECTOR __________ Appeal No. 97-4153 Application 08/498,3751 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before CALVERT, MEISTER, and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claim 1, which is the only claim remaining of record in the application. The appellant's invention is directed to a squeeze canteen 1Application for patent filed July 5, 1995. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007