THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TREVOR J. POWLES, MIR A. IMRAN,
DEEPAK GANDHI and BABER R. SYED
____________
Appeal No. 97-4459
Application No. 08/421,0631
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 4. Claims 5 through 7 have been
allowed. Claims 8 through 16 have been withdrawn from
consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being drawn to a
nonelected invention.
Application for patent filed April 13, 1995.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007