THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte W. DUDLEY JOHNSON _____________ Appeal No. 98-0002 Application 08/300,0891 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before COHEN, PATE, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 14 through 28. These are the only claims remaining in the 1Application for patent filed September 2, 1994. According to applicant, the application is a continuation-in- part of Application 07/898,012, filed June 12, 1992, now Patent No. 5,343,652, issued September 6, 1994. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007