Appeal No. 98-0002 Application No. 08/300,089 We are in agreement with the examiner's finding that the German reference is silent with respect to using the laser to kill pests behind a solid barrier. In fact, there is not a scintilla of evidence in the German patent that a barrier is contemplated in the method disclosed therein. We note that the German reference is directed to killing swarms of locusts which swarms are present in the open air. Inasmuch as the examiner may not resort to speculation, unfounded assumptions or hindsight reconstruction to support deficiencies in the factual basis of a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103, see In re GPAC Inc., 57 F.3d 1573, 1582, 35 USPQ2d 1116, 1123 (Fed. Cir. 1995), we are constrained to reverse the rejection on appeal as it rests on no factual basis we can ascertain. REVERSED IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007