Appeal No. 98-0103 Page 11
Application No. 08/248,745
paragraph, as the specification, as originally filed, does not
provide support for the invention as is now claimed is affirmed,
(3) the decision of the examiner to reject claims 10 through 15
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as the specification, as
originally filed, does not provide support for the invention as
is now claimed is reversed, and (4) the decision of the examiner
to reject claims 1 through 7 and claims 10 through 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007