Appeal No. 98-0459
Application 08/658,719
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Nathan 3,768,633 Oct. 30, 1973
Artz 4,044,933 Aug. 30, 1977
Cuppari 4,909,382 Mar. 20, 1990
Jessen 4,925,017 May 15, 1990
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 1 through 3, and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jessen in view of Cuppari and
Nathan.
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Jessen in view of Cuppari and Nathan, applied
above, further in view of Artz.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer (Paper
No. 9), while the complete statement of appellants’ argument can
be found in the brief (Paper No. 8).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007