THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ASHOK S. KRISHNA
__________
Appeal No. 98-0552
Application 08/357,5671
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, CAROFF, and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of
claims 1-8 and 33-52, all the pending claims in the subject
reissue application.
1 Application filed December 16, 1994, for Reissue of U.S. Patent No. 4,869,807,
issued September 26, 1989. According to appellant, Application RE 08/357,567 is a
continuation of Application 07/764,599, filed September 24, 1991, abandoned; which is a
Reissue of Application 07/067,678, filed June 26, 1987, now Patent No. 4,869,807, issued
September 26, 1989; which is a continuation-in-part of Application 06/792,718, filed
October 30, 1985, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007