Appeal No. 98-1183 Page 9 Application No. 08/352,513 For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 1, and claims 2 through 7 and 9 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. Claim 8 Claim 8 recites: A static support for supporting the sash of a tilt-in window, comprising: a vertical member having an adjustment means disposed thereon for selectively adjusting the length thereof; a stand coupled to said vertical member, wherein said stand holds said vertical member in a generally vertical orientation; at least one cross-member pivotably coupled to said vertical member, wherein said at least one cross member can be selectively pivoted into a position generally perpendicular to said vertical member; padding disposed on a top surface of said at least one cross member; and at least one element extending from said at least one cross member beyond said top surface that engages an edge of the sash thereby retaining the sash in a predetermined orientation relative to said static support. After the scope and content of the prior art are determined, the differences between the prior art and thePage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007