THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD L. BARKER
____________
Appeal No. 98-1234
Application No. 08/516,2141
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and MEISTER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Richard L. Barker (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 1-10, 21-25, 27 and 28. Claims 26 and 29,
the only other claims present in the application, have been
1Application for patent filed August 17, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007