THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ KELLY E. MAYO, Junior Party,1 v. MICHAEL O. THORNER, BRUCE D. GAYLINN, JOHN R. ZYSK AND CECIL M. EPPLER, Senior Party.2 ______________ Interference No. 103,706 ______________ Before RONALD H. SMITH, METZ, and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. 1Application 08/291,356, filed August 16, 1994. Accorded benefit of U.S. Application 07/953,494, filed September 28, 1992. Assignor to Northwestern University. 2Application 07/902,826, filed June 23, 1992. Assignor to The University of Virginia Patent Foundation and American Cyanamid Company. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007