Interference No. 104,166
Patel v. Fuller
The interference is before a merits panel for entry of a
final decision and judgment.
B. Findings of Fact
1. This interference was declared on May 22, 1998, with
a single count.
2. Senior party Fuller filed preliminary motion 1 to
add proposed count 2, contingent preliminary motion 2 to add
proposed count 3 in case preliminary motion 1 is not granted,
and contingent preliminary motion 3 to add proposed count 4 in
case preliminary motions 1 and 2 are not granted.
3. Junior party Patel filed no preliminary motions.
4. Junior party Patel filed no preliminary statement.
5. Junior party Patel did not oppose any one of senior
party Fuller’s preliminary motions 1, 2, and 3.
6. On September 1, 1998, administrative patent judge
Murriel Crawford issued an order for junior party Patel to
show cause why judgment should not be granted against the
junior party with respect to the subject matter of count 1,
setting a response period of 20 days.
7. Junior party Patel has not responded to the show
cause order.
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007