Interference No. 104,166
Patel v. Fuller
total failure to prosecute this interference. See Paper No.
5.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of count 1
is awarded to senior party Fuller and entered against junior
party Patel;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of
count 2 is awarded to senior party Fuller and entered against
junior party Patel;
FURTHER ORDERED that Rajendra Patel is not entitled to
claims 11, 13, 14, 18, 19, and 25 of U.S. Patent No.
5,315,636, which correspond to count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that Rajendra Patel is not entitled to
claims 1-10, 12, 15, and 20-24 of U.S. Patent No. 5,315,636,
which correspond to count 2;
FURTHER ORDERED that on this record, Robert M. Fuller,
Frederick A. Epler, and Maxwell E. Manowski, are entitled to
claims 90, 92, 93, 95, 96, 102, and 103 of their application
08/447,751, which correspond to count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that on this record, Robert M. Fuller,
Frederick A. Epler, and Maxwell E. Manowski are entitled to
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007