Interference No. 103,036
pertinent under 37 CFR § 1.655, with the caveat, "[n]o other
motions will be reviewed."
In addition, the party Cataldi et al. filed a motion
(Paper No. 503) for a testimony period to introduce evidence in
support of its preliminary motions and its oppositions to the
other parties' preliminary motions. The APJ granted the motion
to the extent that the party Cataldi was authorized to introduce
into evidence only that evidence relied upon in its preliminary
motion nos. 1 to 4, 23, 24, 32 and 38 (Paper Nos. 101 to 104,
123, 124, 296 and 362), in its replies (Paper Nos. 270 to 273,
292, 293, 355 and 392) and in its oppositions to any opponent's
motion which would be reviewed. The APJ's order states, "[n]o
other evidence may be introduced." See Section V of
Interlocutory Order No. 4, dated July 19, 1996 (Paper No. 534)
and page 17 of Interlocutory Order No. 9, dated October 29, 1996
(Paper No. 632).
The parties Wang et al., Tucholski, Cataldi et al. and
Burroughs et al. took testimony, filed records and briefs, and
appeared through counsel, at final hearing.
-6-
Page: Previous 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007