Interference No. 103,036
ISSUES
The junior party Cataldi et al.'s opening brief30
raises the following issues:
1. Whether we should decide motion nos. 10, 11, 17, 22, 31, 33
to 37, and 39.
2. Whether the senior party Burroughs et al.'s patent claims 1
to 11 and reissue claims 13 to 32, 34 to 36 and 38 to 51 should
be designated as not corresponding to the count, as urged in
motion no. 1?
3. Whether the senior party Burroughs et al.'s patent claims 1
to 11 are invalid and reissue claims 13 to 51 are unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as urged in motion no.
2?
4. Whether the senior party Burroughs et al.'s reissue claims 13
to 51 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,
for lack of adequate written description and for being based on a
non-enabling disclosure, as urged in motion no. 3?
5. Whether the senior party Burroughs et al.'s reissue claims 1
to 51 are unpatentable on the ground of double patenting, as
urged in motion no. 23?
On page 156 of its main brief, the party Cataldi et al.30
withdraws consideration of its motion no. 4 in favor of its motion
no. 32.
-7-
Page: Previous 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007