Interference No. 103,036
OPINION
Issues Entitled to Consideration
Interlocutory Order No. 9, Section VI (page 17),
identifies the motions filed by the party Wang et al. to be
considered at final hearing. These are the party Wang et al.’s
motion nos. 3 to 7, which are raised in issues 2B to 2E and 3A.
The motions raised by issues 1A, 1B, 2A, 3B and 3C are not
entitled to any consideration since the motions were not
identified in the interlocutory order. Accordingly, the motions
entitled to consideration are those raised in issues 2B to 2E, 3A
and 4A.
Issue 2B
Issue 2B concerns the party Wang et al.’s motion no. 6
that the party Burroughs et al.’s claims are unpatentable over
prior art. The argument concerning this motion appears in the
party Wang et al.’s main brief at pages 30 to 66. Motion no. 6,
which appears on pages 134 to 158 of the party Wang et al.’s
record (WR 134 to 158) urges the following grounds for
unpatentability:
1. Burroughs et al.’s claims 13 to 23, 30 to 32, 41 and 42 are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Kiernan,
U.S. Patent No. 4,723,656 (the party Wang et al.’s exhibit no. 22
-9-
Page: Previous 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007