Interference No. 103,036
Issues 2D, 2E and 3A
These issues concern the party Wang et al.’s motion
nos. 4, 5, and 7, which appear at WR 74 to 81, 101 to 108, and
210 to 235. These motions urge that the party Burroughs et al.’s
reissue claims 13 to 51 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first and second paragraphs, and under 35 U.S.C. § 251.
These motions urge the same grounds for unpatentability
as urged by the party Tucholski in its preliminary motion (Paper
No. 82) for judgment and by the party Cataldi et al. in its
preliminary motion nos. 2, 3, and 24 and are denied for the
reasons set forth in the Final Decision (Paper No. 802) with
respect to the party Tucholski’s motion and in the Final Decision
(Paper No. 803) with respect to the party Cataldi et al.’s
motions.
Since we have held that the Burroughs et al. reissue
application complies with 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second
paragraphs, and 35 U.S.C. § 251, no basis exists to deny
Burroughs et al., as the reissue applicants, the benefit of the
filing date of its involved patent.
For the foregoing reasons, motion nos. 4, 5, and 7 are
denied.
Issue 4A
-14-
Page: Previous 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007