BARKER V. ELSON et al. - Page 24




          Interference No. 103,146                                                    



          as a whole, senior party Elson has established a reduction to               
          practice of the subject matter of the count by September 25,                
          1981, the date of the Edwards internal memorandum (EX-20).                  


                                       Leakage                                        
                    Notwithstanding the evidence that Elson has adduced               
          with respect to actual reduction to practice, Barker argues                 
          (Brief at 30, 57-63) that Elson failed to reduce the invention              
          to practice in the 1981 time frame because of a leakage                     
          problem with some of the closed loop injectate systems.                     
                    Barker cites the discussion of a leakage problem in               
          Elson Exhibit 52, the October progress report at 009864-5,                  
          009897 and in Elson Exhibit 53 at 009816.  It is important to               
          note, that the first units manufactured exhibited little or no              
          leakage.   BX-107.  This Briggs memo states that only one unit              
          of the first 529 units manufactured actually leaked.  These                 
          were the units intended for field and clinical trials.  No                  
          leaks, whatsoever, were reported during the clinical trials                 
          that we have held establish a reduction to practice.  However,              




                                          24                                          





Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007