CHENEVEY et al. V. BAARS et al. - Page 2




              Interference No. 103,169                                                                                         





                                                     FINAL DECISION                                                            
                      This interference concerns a process for preparing a biaxially oriented film of a rigid                  
              rod heterocyclic liquid crystalline polymer. The subject matter at issue is defined by a                         
              single count which is identical to claim 1 of the Chenevey et al. patent.                                        
              The count reads as follows:                                                                                      
              Count 1                                                                                                          
                      A process for preparing a biaxially oriented film of a rigid rod heterocyclic liquid                     
              crystalline polymer, comprising:                                                                                 
                      (i)  providing a dope from a polymerization mixture of a rigid rod                                       
                      heterocyclic liquid crystalline polymer and a solvent;                                                   
                      (ii)  extruding the dope to form a film;                                                                 
                      (iii) imparting biaxial orientation to the film to increase the transverse                               
              strength thereof;                                                                                                
                      (iv) solidifying the biaxially oriented film; and                                                        
                      (v) washing the solidified film to remove the solvent.                                                   
              Chenevey et al. patent claims 1-26 and Baars et al. claims 23-45 correspond to the count.                        
                      Upon declaration of the interference, Baars et al. was accorded benefit of their two                     
              earlier filed U.S. applications, by virtue of which, Baars et al. was declared senior party in                   
              this proceeding.                                                                                                 
                      During the preliminary motion stage of this proceeding, Baars et al. filed a motion                      

                                                              2                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007