THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 52
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
BOLESH J. SKUTNIK and HARRY L. BRIELMANN, Jr.
Junior Party,
v.
YUTAKA HASHIMOTO, MASANOBU YUMOTO, TOSHIHIKO UMABA,
YUTAKA KAMADA, TSUTOMU MATSUBARA and SIGEO KAWAGUCHI
Senior Party.
Patent Interference No. 103,224
FINAL HEARING: November 10, 1999
Before CAROFF, HANLON and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 Application 07/635,922, filed 12/28/90. Accorded the benefit of U.S. Serial No.
07/272,133, filed 11/16/88, now Patent No. 5,112,658 issued 05/12/92. Assigned to Ensign-
Bickford Optics Company; A Corporation of Connecticut.
2 Application 07/187,365, filed 04/28/88, now U.S. Patent No. 4,891,241, issued 01/02/90.
Assigned to Dainippon Ink and Chemicals, Inc. and Yamamura Glass Co., Ltd.; both
Corporations of Japan.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007